Violets(violet violets) @violet@vulpine.club

I drink from my mug with the international MUF standards association logo on it. Boot up my laptop with a witty MUF snippet on it and crack my hands, "Time to write code that will make my life bad three hours later when the user I hate finds a bug in it and then starts to mansplain at me about some problem in my code."

I log into mudlet and potato and start the fun of balancing doing bad ero-RP, and coding. A notification dings and I see that that code already broke, and I wonder why I don't have that person blocked.
"Hexyyyy!" They say. My staff alt being called Hexaferrum, this makes sense.

They found another problem in the awful slot machine that the game owner had me create as a first project. I grimace, seeing that it's the same fucking problem that I declared fixed a while back. Realizing what had gone wrong, I type in a few lines followed by an announcement that the slot machine is gone because I could not be bothered to care about this creakily broken code. That everything that it had once done had already been placed in more useful and better interfaces which make more sense.

Man, bad take bot is really saturating the market of bad political takes.

This just happened outside the kitchen where we were lisping on our laptop. :3

Bears are kinda funny animals.

If you have to do runtime type resolution of any sort it's a dynamic language. :3

Dog status <loud slurping food noises>

Til that Lucy is a dirty neolib who loves voting problems away o.o

@BestGirlGrace :3

So, hop into your sbcl, and run (defconstant pi 'balls)

Ah, here's what we'd meant to go for :3

Love this effect :3

OPSEC is just a persistent and vulgar myth.

Ooh, just remembered how our bot that we wrote understood enough grammar to enhance the generation of sentences.... It didn't learn that from us of course :3

Good old ::, scope resolution operator :3

CNF? No thanks. We'd prefer horn clauses if we need to wrangle things of that sort.