Jamie 鈽煂光挾馃尰 is a user on vulpine.club. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.
Jamie 鈽煂光挾馃尰 @slightlyflightyone

Do any Mastodonians run/prefer Windows?

@scarlett I don鈥檛 shame people for OS preferences. I just wanted to know if this is as FOSS-y as it feels sometimes.

@slightlyflightyone nope, there's no wayland on netbsd (its very non-portable) and i'm not quite hardcore enough to be doing everything in a framebuffer console. yet.

but yes, there are people here that run microsoft windows. there are people here that aren't massively into tech but want a better/safer alternative to twitter. i'm friends with a couple ;3

@scarlett NetBSD? I鈥檓 surprised anyone is still using that for a daily driver. It seems like it鈥檚 very much dying as a popular OS.

@scarlett I didn鈥檛 mean to insult your OS of choice. I just never hear of anyone using it.

@slightlyflightyone honestly most usage is indirect. netbsd's code is everywhere but you'd never know it. perfectly usable, though, and there are a handful of us crazy enough to run it on our laptops

blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/gett

blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/pine

i'll actually be at a convention with a handful of other netbsd devs in a couple of weeks (the netbsd foundation is paying for my travel expenses too)

@scarlett Oh! I meant as a desktop platform, tbh. I鈥檓 aware of how widely used NetBSD code is in other OSes and in some server deployments.

@scarlett Congratulations on earning NetBSD Foundation鈥檚 sponsorship for your convention. c:

@slightlyflightyone

a lot of big "desktopy" stuff is there - firefox, gimp, blender, libreoffice, xfce, mate, mpv, vlc, retroarch, kernel mode setting for intel, amd, and nvidia (nouveau), etc. no chromium because google won't accept patches so it has to be done downstream but it's whatever. also no webrtc because no sctp yet (ongoing project) which is a big negative point.

@scarlett I鈥檓 more of an i3, KDE, and Cinnamon girl myself. I doubt there is any problem getting at least two of those running?

@scarlett @slightlyflightyone
It鈥檚 a shame imo because Wayland provides a much cleaner architecture than X11. As I understand it, there鈥檚 nothing stopping Wayland (the protocol) from being implemented on *BSD, but the reference implementation of Wayland (Weston) depends on quite a few Linux-specific technologies

@jordyd @slightlyflightyone mostly little things that aren't even necessary to depend on, like epoll, and not the big stuff like drm which isn't a problem.

easy to fix with patches but the developers' attitude is unfortunate.

@scarlett @slightlyflightyone
That鈥檚 a shame. I hope they change their minds but I kinda expect they won鈥檛. There seems to be a general attitude growing in the Linux world that *BSD is a second-class citizen

@jordyd @slightlyflightyone there is an attitude among certain devs that work for certain OS and commercial support vendors that BSD anything is a threat to their employer's interests, unfortunately

if you go back to the older generations who work on this stuff, a lot of them were there for the proprietary unix wars in the 90s and see anything non-linux as an oppressive dinosaur or something

@scarlett @slightlyflightyone
I understand that porting stuff can be time-consuming, but not accepting easy patches and not cooperating with the community at large is kinda shameful imo

@scarlett @slightlyflightyone seems like sway (and other wayland stuff that already is in) is supposedly working on FreeBSD, but the port itself isn't in yet

@pea @slightlyflightyone yeah they're maintaining a mess of patches to make it work in their ports tree. same with chromium.

@scarlett @slightlyflightyone For some reason I was actually under the impression there was a small group of people actively working on keeping sway *BSD compatible upstream, but that may have just been in my head
@scarlett @slightlyflightyone that said, I don't know where I would've read that ^^'
@scarlett @slightlyflightyone Ah, you know what it is? I bet I'm thinking of wlroots, what sway is moving to once it's ready.

It seems to be intended to build with no patches on FreeBSD at least, if nothing else, from reading the README. I don't think current wlc sway is compatible

@pea @slightlyflightyone

svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/

i should really try to get it working but it's currently a miracle i manage to get out of bed so maybe later lmao

@scarlett @pea I relate to this. Hmu anytime if you need a hug to get you through the day.

@slightlyflightyone I run Windows on my gaming machine(s), but I wouldn't say that I prefer it.

@skipfordj I actually don鈥檛 have a gaming machine, but that was my joke, yeah. c: